This is a deeply sensitive and emotionally charged topic, and it’s important to handle such matters with care, clarity, and responsibility — especially when they concern national security, communal harmony, and the legal process.
Here are a few critical points to consider:
1. Allegations vs. Proven Facts
The claim that Parvez and Bashir Ahmad Jothar “sheltered terrorists” involved in a massacre must be seen through the lens of due process. If the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has indeed arrested them and is pursuing a case, it will now be up to the courts to determine guilt based on evidence.
Due process is not weakness; it’s the foundation of a just society.
2. "Kashmiriyat" Shouldn’t Be Generalized
The term Kashmiriyat reflects a centuries-old ethos of communal harmony, mutual respect, and cultural unity among Kashmiris of all faiths. Holding an entire cultural identity responsible for the alleged actions of two individuals undermines the broader message of unity and peaceful coexistence that Kashmiriyat has stood for — especially in times of conflict.
3. Justice vs. Hatred
Anger is a natural response to horrific acts of terror — especially when innocent lives are lost. But justice is served not by collective blame or communal stereotyping, but by identifying the guilty and holding them accountable through law.
If the Jothar brothers knowingly aided terrorists, they must be punished to the fullest extent of the law. But it’s crucial to distinguish between individual culpability and community character.
4. Let the Court Decide
The NIA’s job is to investigate. The judiciary's job is to decide based on facts. Our job — as citizens — is to demand truth and accountability, not prejudice and polarization.
If you'd like, I can also help summarize the NIA’s official statement or give a timeline of events based on verified sources. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Post a Comment